Research Question One
Have there been legal concerns brought to the attention to the site’s creators? If so, how have those been addressed? If not, why is that? What did the creators do, if anything, to ensure entire website is legal?
Most of the concerns brought to the creators’ attention have been more ethically based. It is not a question of legality; the information on the site is considered legal by the protection of freedom of speech, expression and press granted under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment. And while majority of the content on the site pertains to psychoactive drugs, of which most are illegal to use in some capacity, the creators and staff of the site make a conscious effort to keep a website of information and not one to promote drug use. As senior review staff member wrote in an online interview, “Erowid is in no way ‘pro-drug’; we are ‘pro-information.’”
The staff of Erowid have never been contacted by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Association, and police officers, doctors and parents have found the site helpful to understand more about a drug that is affecting a love one or was involved with an overdose or death.
However, there are instances when Erowid is contacted by an angry or concerned individual. Earth Erowid, a co-founder of the site, wrote in the interview, “If anyone points out things that might constitute illegal activity, we take it seriously.” Because the staff wants to make the site accessible to law enforcement, they are extremely cautious of what information is on the site and how it is presented.
After looking over the site and chatting with the staff over a very long email thread, I have come to the conclusion that Erowid.org is indeed legal. The issue of ethics, however, brings about more debate, which brings me to my second research question.
Research Question Two
Is the mission of this site ethical? To its creators, its users and community, its viewers, and to random visitors?
Despite the assurance of legality, the ethical issues surrounding a site like Erowid are not so clearly defined. Ethics relates to things that are morally right. Although legal, is it morally right to provide information about harmful drugs in an unfiltered, uncensored space such as the Internet? Although the content is reviewed, is it right that only a few people have the final say in what is put on the site when the content could be used in a dangerous way?
Erowid’s mission states: Their vision states:To the creators and staff of Erowid, as one can see from the site’s mission and vision, they believe the site to be ethical. The crewmembers are the community and they devote many hours reviewing and fact checking articles and experience reports that are submitted (see question three). I was not able to contact authors of the experience reports but as they have their writing posted, I am going to make an assumption that they generally do not have an issue with Erowid. I did, however, conduct a survey to see what people thought generally about a site like Erowid, and then specifically what they thought about erowid.org. The survey was anonymous and I do not know how familiar the respondents were with Erowid.
Here are some quotes from the surveys and I have analyzed their messages to relate to my conclusion about the ethics of Erowid.
“What the reader does with the information can be judged as ethical or unethical, but not the act of providing information.”
-I believe this individual makes a valid point in targeting the user of the information as the one who is subject to scrutiny over ethical behavior. Information is information and it does not become unethical until it is presented in an inaccurate way or is used in another mode of behavior that is considered unethical. If humans did not share information, no matter how touchy it may be, we would never be able to advance in society. Erowid presents clear, balanced, and accurate information so that on a subject that is so often taboo, there is a way to learn about a complex part of humanity and human experience. Jon Hanna wrote in his email to me, “As someone who grew up in those days before the Internet was widely available, there was a dearth of reliable, factual, information available about psychoactive drugs when I was a child and young adult.” The amount and diversity of information related to psychoactive drugs on Erowid is astounding, and while people may it in unethical ways, it is important for the information to be out there. I would argue that not providing information in fear or because the subject is drugs and drugs are illegal is unethical. Providing information like a healthy drug dosage helps more than damages. If the information was not allowed to be somewhere, who would ever know how to stay safe while using drugs? As the next quote hints at, denying information will not stop drug use.
“I think it is the epitome of ethical behaviour. Of course, these drugs are illegal. But in reality, that fact is not going to end drug use, as it has not.”
-Drugs have been around probably longer than humans, if you follow the theory of evolution. Psychoactive drugs, although oftentimes dangerous, have been known to spark creativity in some of the world’s most influential people. Humans are generally curious and have the capacity to understand things larger than them and it makes sense the mystery of drugs and altered states would be appealing to many. Because of the inherent dangers of using drugs without knowledge of how, it is important, again, for the information to explain how to use, where to use, what’s normal and what isn’t, what is safe to eat or drink while using is extremely important to help drug users stay safe. Erowid acknowledges drug use and by providing information and talking at conferences, they are “the epitome of ethical behaviour.”
“Only ethical for adults or with supervision.”
“The website should be able to talk about what ever it wants as long as it is to the appropriate aged group and does not break any laws.”
-These quotes touch on, perhaps without knowing it, one of the largest issues of digital media today. How and should the Internet even be censored? Could Erowid be considered ethical if it was only observed by adults or the “appropriate age group”? While I understand the argument for information about drugs being kept from children or even young adults, I do not think it makes the site more or less ethical. The information will remain the same. Is it unethical for a ten-year-old to read but ethical for a sixteen-year-old to read? What happens in those six years for information to suddenly be ethical to read? If, however, one is saying that having the content available to young people is unethical, I think there may be more of an argument. But, I would argue on the flipside that young people are generally more experimental and more willing to take risks. They may use drugs anyway even if they are not allowed to see the information on a site like Erowid. Websites are only part of the Internet. There are databases for professional journals, Facebook, chat rooms, friends, and one could even find a book in the library to search for information about drugs. It could be argued that it is almost more dangerous to keep facts about drugs from the age group that is one of the more likely to experiment haphazardly. I find that these two quotes are almost invalid when discussing the ethics of Erowid. Adults can make terrible decisions about drugs, so why should it only be ethical for them to see the site? Any age group can read a website unless it is blocked by a filter set by a parent or a school. Furthermore, Erowid does not break any laws.
Research Question Three
What is the criteria to post recreational experiences or scholarly research on the site? Have some been rejected? If so, for what reason?
“We reject approximately 50% of all experience reports submitted for a variety of reasons,” wrote Fire Erowid in an online interview. The reasons include inaccuracy, poor writing and reports that are obviously faked.
“There is always the possibility that someone is fabricating their experience report and that’s part of the reason for the review system as it stands,” wrote Earth. “We take the issue of faked reports very seriously.” But reports are not the only things that are submitted. “For other types of submissions, we have a very rigorous review process, most original documents people send us for publication we just reject without putting it to any other reviewers.“
This part of my research is easy. The criteria for having something put on the web is that it must make it through a rigorous review process and only a senior review staff member may post to the site. Reviewers are trained and fact check stories to make sure the information is accurate. The effort the Erowid crew puts in to ensure that the content on the site is admirable and considerably ethical.
The focus of my research is erowid.org, a site filled with information about psychoactive drugs and their relationship with humans. Because the subject of drugs is often considered taboo in some way, I felt that it was important to not only look into the community of Erowid, but also look at a sampling of the community outside. I conducted two surveys. One focused on how people felt about the discussion of drugs, how often and in what way did discussion of drugs happen, and I ended with a question asking if people thought a site that presented information on drugs was ethical. My second survey focused on people’s experience and knowledge with erowid.org and focused on how often people went on the site, what they used it for, and what they thought about the site in general. While the surveys were being conducted over one week, I was also in contact with the crew of Erowid, and throughout my presentation of my research, I will be integrating my survey results in various ways with the information I received directly from Erowid. I approached the project in this way because the site is an informational site, and while the people behind the scenes are the focus of my ethnography, the site itself is designed to inform a different community, and I felt it was my responsibility to look into the general populace as well.
Survey One: “How do you feel about discussing drugs?”
Seventy-one people took this survey, and I broke that number down here into gender.
I sent this survey out over Facebook to over 150 of my “friends” on Facebook. The individuals varied in age, gender, and location in the United States. I encouraged people to share the survey with other friends, and it was also posted here on the erowidethnography. I understand that this is not a true random sampling, but I feel that the voices in the survey at least cover a wide range of views through gender (see left), age and political orientation (see below).
What do you talk about when discussing drugs and drug use? Are these discussions face-to-face, online, or through another medium (and what other medium is it)?
“I try to explain to my children how drugs not only affect you when you take them—they can effect you the rest of your life”
“I have these discussions face-to-face about the frequency that other students on campus use them and how they affect my personal relationships.”
“I do think it is important, as the more this subject is ignored due to taboo or controversy, the more people will go behind closed doors and abuse these drugs without being informed. Information may be the best defense against overdose and irresponsible usage.”
Do you feel that a website dedicated to presenting information about psychoactive drugs (most of them illegal to use, but many being legal in the U.S) is ethical? What would cause you to think it was unethical versus ethical?
“I wouldn’t say it is unethical. If it would be informational, what the reader does with the information can be judged as ethical or unethical, but not the act of providing information.”
“I think such a website would be morally permissible, but not morally praiseworthy.”
Survey Two: “How do you feel about the website erowid.org?”
Only 16 people took this survey, but I expected it to be lower as its purpose was to survey people who are familiar in some way with erowid.org. A link to the Erowid site accompanied the invitation to take this survey, and I encouraged people to look at the site and then take the survey, or take the survey if they already knew about Erowid. I again sent the link to everyone who had been invited to the Facebook event for the first survey (note: if the other survey had been sent to others via Facebook without my knowledge, they too would have been included in the second survey invitation). Again, I felt that although it was a smaller number of respondents, I was impressed with the balance of gender (see below). I did not inquire about age or political orientation in this survey.
When visiting erowid.org, what types of things do you read and look into and why?
“I think it’s a useful tool for people who are interested in psychoactive drugs and their effect on humans. If people are going to use these substances, they should at least be knowledgeable about them (or have the chance to be). Erowid.org serves this purpose well.”
“it seemed informational, but I felt like I was doing something wrong when I was reading it.”
Questions? Comments? Please post below!
Thank you to everyone who took the time to take the survey about discussing drugs. While my research is centered around the exploration of the legality and ethics of erowid.org, I wanted to also get a sense of how a random sampling (random in personality, age, gender, and hopefully political orientation) thought about drugs in general. What sort of feelings surround drugs and discussion about them, as that is really what erowid.org is. I have now since created a follow-up survey that inquires about the usage of erowid.org. Click here to take the survey if you have visited erowid.org and would be willing to share your feelings and experiences with the site. To visit erowid.org again or for the first time, click on the banner below. All information provided will remain anonymous.
My preliminary findings have shown that the site is simply a thorough guide through the complex, and often misunderstood, world of psychoactive drugs. The user community has been proven difficult to contact as the names of contributors are mere usernames to provide privacy and there are not email addresses linked to them. The behind-the-scenes crew of the site, however, was extremely responsive when I contacted them, and my work is beginning to shift towards the community of the people who work on the site instead of those who use it.
The members of the crew come from various backgrounds and countries from around the world. It is apparent through many of their mini bios that they care about the mission of the website, and each of them provides a personal passion and vision to the upkeep of erowid. I hope to gather and publish more information about them soon!
Don’t have time to take the survey? Share your thoughts about erowid.org below!
Hello, and welcome to my online community ethnography project blog!
In the world of digital media, there are endless possibilities to create new identities, to explore new worlds, and to partake in discussions otherwise kept silent in the privacy of people’s homes. As more and more opportunities arise for people to delve deeper and deeper into the inter-workings of cyberspace, legal and ethical issues also arise. It is becoming increasingly more difficult to keep track of every issue brought to the public’s attention, and the lines of what is legally and morally right are becoming blurrier than ever.
As a journalism student, I am told daily that the publication world is changing. Everything is moving online to the vast world of digital media. This semester, one of my teachers has assigned my class the task to research an online community and explore possible legal and ethical questions that surround the site, the users, the viewers, and even its use by outside members. We are not to judge or frame anyone. That is not the intent. The objective is to take this opportunity to look into a different realm of communication and community, learn something new, exercise our new found knowledge in digital media law and ethics and produce our findings in an innovative, experimental (and digitally-focused) way.
For the next week and a half, I will be exploring the world of erowid.org, an extensive site about psychoactive drugs (categorized by plant, herb, chemicals, etc). The site includes research articles, personal experiences, art, events, and much more information for over 25 drugs. The content is submitted by a mix of different people who use the sight for various reasons. And while many of the drugs and compounds explored on the site are illegal in the United States, there are legal drugs that are focused on as well.
In my research, I am curious about struggles that the site creators have had to face, their motives behind developing such an extensive drug database, and if there has been any outside pressure and persecution towards the creators and the site’s content. I wonder about the ethical concerns of what is published and how, what parts of the drugs are focused on and why, and I hope to look at the ethics of conversation throughout the site.
To help me get a better understanding of the site in its entirety, I hope to look at the people involved and also those who are outside the community. What are their thoughts about a site dedicated to drugs that are so often feared and discussed negatively? Are there people who are worried about the effect this site may have on others and their drug use? Are there people who think that a site which allows discussion of the dangers and enjoyment of the drugs is a valuable thing?
I hope in the next week and a half to have all these questions answered and more! I am also curious to know what you think. Check out www.erowid.org, and post any thoughts you may have that relate to what is discussed here.